4.7 Article

Isolating the decay rate of cosmological gravitational potential

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 647, 期 1, 页码 55-59

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/505297

关键词

cosmic microwave background; gravitational lensing; large-scale structure of universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The decay rate of cosmological gravitational potential measures the deviation from Einstein-de Sitter universe and can put strong constraints on the nature of dark energy and gravity. The usual method to measure this decay rate is through the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect-large-scale structure (LSS) cross-correlation. However, the interpretation of the measured correlation signal is complicated by galaxy bias and the matter power spectrum. This could bias and/or degrade its constraints on the nature of dark energy and gravity. But combining the lensing-LSS cross-correlation measurements, the decay rate of gravitational potential can be isolated. For any given narrow redshift bin of LSS, the ratio of the two cross-correlations directly measures (d ln D-phi/d ln a) H(z)/W(chi, chi(s)), where D-phi is the linear growth factor of the gravitational potential, H is the Hubble constant at redshift z, W(chi; chi(s)) is the lensing kernel, and chi and chi(s) are the comoving angular diameter distance to lens and source, respectively. This method is optimal in the sense that (1) the measured quantity is essentially free of systematic errors and is only limited by cosmic variance, and (2) the measured quantity depends only on several cosmological parameters and can be predicted from first principles unambiguously. Although fundamentally limited by the inevitably large cosmic variance associated with the ISW measurements, it can still put useful independent constraints on the amount of dark energy and its equation of state. It can also provide a powerful test of modified gravity and can distinguish the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati model from Lambda CDM at > 2.5 sigma confidence level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据