4.5 Article

Epithelial mitochondria-rich cells and associated innervation in adult and developing zebrafish

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 497, 期 5, 页码 817-832

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/cne.21020

关键词

MRC chloride cell; ion transport; innervation; gill; pseudobranch; epithelium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies of ion regulation by mitochondria-rich cells (MRCs) of transport epithelia in fish have revealed many processes by which ion homeostasis is achieved. However the control of these mechanisms and, particularly, the extent of nervous system involvement are not completely understood. We characterized the potential innervation of MRCs in various gill and extrabranchial tissues involved in ion transport in the model vertebrate the zebrafish. Confocal and conventional microscopy of whole-mount preparations were combined with immunofluorescence techniques to label MRCs with antibodies against a subunit of the enzyme Na+/K+-ATPase and nerve fibers with a zebrafish neuronal marker, zn-12. MRCs of the gill filaments were identified by their morphology and migration out to the lamellae in response to ion-poor water acclimation. Gill MRCs were intimately associated with nerve fibers originating from outside the filaments. MRCs of the opercular epithelium resembled those of the gill and were also located adjacent to nerve fibers. Mitochondria-rich pseudobranch cells were identified in the pseudobranch by immunofluorescence and labeling of dissociated cells with the mitochondrial marker DASPEL Pseudobranch MRCs resembled gill MRCs and received innervation from a dense network of nerve fibers. In larvae, MRCs were distributed across the surface of the skin. These cells were situated among a dense network of varicose nerve fibers, and some MRCs of the skin displayed extensive cytoplasmic processes. Evidence is presented suggestive of widespread association of MRCs with the nervous system in transport epithelia and the neural control of MRC-mediated ion regulation in teleost fish.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据