4.4 Article

Vaccines Provided by Family Physicians

期刊

ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 507-510

出版社

ANNALS FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.1370/afm.1185

关键词

Vaccines; immunizations; family physicians

资金

  1. Merck Co
  2. Wyeth
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [IU66IP000119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE This study was conducted to document current immunization practices by family physicians METHODS In 2008 the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) conducted a survey among a random sample of 2,000 of its members who reported spending 80% or more of their time in direct patient care The survey consisted of questions regarding the demographics of the practice, vaccines that are provided at the physicians' clinical site, whether the practice refers patients elsewhere for vaccines, and participation in the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program RESULTS The response rate was 38 5%, 31 8% after non office based respondents were deleted A high proportion of respondents (80% or more) reported providing most routinely recommended child, adolescent and adult vaccines at their practice sites The exceptions were rotavirus vaccine for children and herpes zoster vaccine for adults, A significant proportion, however, reported referring elsewhere for some vaccines (44 1% for children and adolescent vaccines and 53 5% for adult vaccines) with the most frequent referral location being a public health department A higher proportion of solo and 2 physician practices than larger practices reported referring patients A lack of adequate payment was listed as the reason for referring patients elsewhere for vaccines by one half of those who refer patients One half of responders do not participate in the VFC program CONCLUSIONS Provision of recommended vaccines by most family physicians remains an important service Smaller practices have more difficulty offering a full array of vaccine products, and lack of adequate payment contributes to refer ring patients outside the medical home The reasons behind the lack of participation in the VFC program deserve further study

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据