4.5 Article

Do the health benefits of education vary by sociodemographic subgroup? Differential returns to education and implications for health inequities

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 759-766

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.08.014

关键词

Educational status; Ethnic groups; Immigrants; Socioeconomic factors; health status disparities; sex

资金

  1. National Institute of Aging [1R01AG056360]
  2. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [F32HD091945] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG056360] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Evidence suggests education is an important life course determinant of health, but few studies examine differential returns to education by sociodemographic subgroup. Methods: Using National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (n = 6158) cohort data, we evaluate education attained by age 25 years and physical health (PCS) and mental health component summary scores (MCS) at age 50 years. Race / ethnicity, sex, geography, immigration status, and childhood socioeconomic status (cSES) were evaluated as effect modifiers in birth year adjusted linear regression models. Results: The association between education and PCS was large among high cSES respondents (beta = 0.81 per year of education, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.94), and larger among low cSES respondents (interaction beta = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.72). The association between education and MCS was imprecisely estimated among White men (beta = 0.44; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.90), while, Black women benefited more from each year of education (interaction beta = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.19, 1.64). Similarly, compared to socially advantaged groups, low cSES Blacks, and low and high cSES women benefited more from each year of education, while immigrants benefited less from each year of education. Conclusions: If causal, increases in educational attainment may reduce some social inequities in health. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据