4.5 Article

Vitamin D status and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 399-403

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.02.001

关键词

Pregnancy; Preeclampsia; Hypertension; Pregnancy-induced; Vitamin D; 25-Hydroxyvitamin D

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HD034568, R01 HL064925, K24 HL068041, K23 ES022242, K24 HD069408]
  2. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation
  3. Klarman Scholars Program at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Several studies have reported increased risk of preeclampsia when 25-hyrdoxyvitamin D (25 [OH]D) levels are low. The extent to which 25(OH)D may lower risk for hypertensive disorder during pregnancy remains unclear. Methods: Among women enrolled in the Project Viva prenatal cohort in Massachusetts, we examined associations of 25(OH)D levels obtained at 16.4-36.9 weeks of gestation (mean 27.9 weeks) with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including preeclampsia (56/1591, 3.5%) and gestational hypertension (109/1591, 6.9%). Results: We did not detect an association between plasma 25(OH)D concentration (mean 58, standard deviation 22 nmol/L) and preeclampsia. For each 25 nmol/L increase in 25(OH)D, the adjusted odds ratio for preeclampsia was 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.67). By contrast and contrary to hypothesis, higher 25(OH)D concentrations were associated with higher odds of gestational hypertension: adjusted odds ratio for gestational hypertension was 1.32 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.72) per each 25 nmol/L increment in 25(OH)D. Vitamin D intake patterns suggest that this association was not because of reverse causation. Although the elevated hypertension risk may be due to chance, randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy should monitor for gestational hypertension. Conclusions: These data do not support the hypothesis that higher 25(OH)D levels lower the overall risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据