4.5 Article

Association of long-duration breastfeeding and dental marginal structural models caries estimated with

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 448-454

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.01.013

关键词

Breastfeeding; Dental caries; Epidemiologic methods; Feeding behavior; Marginal structural models; Prospective studies

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [F30 DE022208] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To estimate the association between breastfeeding 24 months or beyond and severe early childhood caries (S-ECC). Methods: Within a birth cohort (n = 715) from low-income families in Porto Alegre, Brazil, the age 38-month prevalence of S-ECC (>= 4 affected tooth surfaces or >= 1 affected maxillary anterior teeth) was compared over breastfeeding duration categories using marginal structural models to account for time-dependent confounding by other feeding habits and child growth. Additional analyses assessed whether daily breastfeeding frequency modified the association of breastfeeding duration and S-ECC. Multiple imputation and censoring weights were used to address incomplete covariate information and missing outcomes, respectively. Confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using bootstrap resampling. Results: Breastfeeding 24 months or beyond was associated with the highest adjusted population-average S-ECC prevalence (0.45; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.54) compared with breastfeeding less than 6 months (0.22; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.28), 6-11 months (0.38; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.53), or 12-23 months (0.39; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.56). High-frequency breastfeeding enhanced the association between long-duration breastfeeding and caries (excess prevalence due to interaction: 0.13; 80% CI, -0.03 to 030). Conclusions: In this population, breastfeeding 24 months or beyond, particularly if frequent, was associated with S-ECC. Dental health should be one consideration, among many, in evaluating health outcomes associated with breastfeeding 24 months or beyond. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据