4.5 Article

Hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, and 2-hour plasma glucose distributions in US population subgroups: NHANES 2005-2010

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 83-89

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.10.008

关键词

Hemoglobin A1c; Fasting plasma glucose; 2-hour plasma glucose; Kernel density estimation; NHANES

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [GS10F0381L]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Although mean concentrations of hemoglobin A1c (A1C), fasting plasma glucose, and 2-hour plasma glucose differ by demographics, it is unclear what other characteristics of the distributions may differ, such as the amount of asymmetry of the distribution (skewness) and shift left or right compared with another distribution (shift). Methods: Using kernel density estimation, we created smoothed plots of the distributions of fasting plasma glucose (N = 7250), 2-hour plasma glucose (N = 5851), and A1C (N = 16,209) by age, raceethnicity, and sex in the 2005-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults including people with and without diabetes. We tested differences in distributions using cumulative logistic regression. Results: The distributions were generally unimodal and right-skewed. All distributions were shifted higher and more right-skewed for older age groups (P < .001 for each marker). Compared with nonHispanic whites, the distribution of fasting plasma glucose was shifted higher for Mexican-Americans (P = .01), whereas the distribution of Al C was shifted higher for non-Hispanic blacks (P < .001). The distribution of fasting plasma glucose was shifted higher for men (P < .001) and the distribution of 2-hour plasma glucose was shifted higher for women (P = .01). Conclusions: We provide a graphic reference for comparing these distributions and diabetes cut-points by demographic factors. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据