4.5 Article

Diet and lifestyle factors and risk of subtypes of esophageal and gastric cancers: classification tree analysis

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 50-57

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.10.009

关键词

Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Gastric cardia adenocarcinoma; Diet; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Classification tree; CART

资金

  1. United States Public Health Service [U01-CA57983, U01-CA57949, U01-CA57923, P30-ES10126]
  2. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [N02-CP40501, N01-CN05230]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Although risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus (EA), gastric cardia (GC), and other (noncardia) gastric (OG) sites have been identified, little is known about interactions among risk factors. We sought to examine interactions of diet, other lifestyle, and medical factors with risks of subtypes of esophageal and gastric cancers. Methods: We used classification tree analysis to analyze data from a population-based case-control study (1095 cases, 687 controls) conducted in Connecticut, New Jersey, and western Washington State. Results: Frequency of reported gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms was the most important risk stratification factor for EA, GC, and OG, with dietary factors (EA, OG), smoking (EA, GC), wine intake (GC, OG), age (OG), and income (OG) appearing to modify the risk of these cancer sites. For esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, smoking was the most important risk stratification factor, with gastroesophageal reflux disease, income, race, noncitrus fruit, and energy intakes further modifying risk. Conclusion: Various combinations of risk factors appear to interact to affect risk of each cancer subtype. Replication of these data mining analyses are required before suggesting causal pathways; however, the classification tree results are useful in partitioning risk and mapping multilevel interactions among risk variables. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据