4.7 Article

Impact of high-dose busulfan plus melphalan as consolidation in metastatic Ewing tumors: A study by the Societe Francaise des Cancers de l'Enfant

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 24, 页码 3997-4002

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.7059

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To improve the prognosis for patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumors (ES/PNET) using conventional chemotherapy and consolidation high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) containing busulfan and melphalan. Patients and Methods Ninety-seven unselected patients with newly diagnosed metastatic ES/PNET received induction chemotherapy that included five cycles of cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m(2)/d for 7 days, doxorubicin 35 mg/m(2)/d once, followed by two cycles of ifosfamide 1.8 g/m(2)/d for 5 days, and etoposide 100 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days. Patients in complete or very good partial remission received HDCT with busulfan total dose 600 mg/m(2) and melphalan 140 mg/m(2) followed by autologous blood stem cells. Local therapy (surgery and/or radiation therapy) was performed before or after HDCT. Results Ninety-seven patients were enrolled from 1991 to 1999 (median age, 12.3 years; range, 0.2 to 25 years). Among them, 75 received HDCT. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate for all 97 patients was 37% and the overall survival (OS) rate was 38%. The EFS after HDCT was 47%. The EFS for the 44 patients with lung-only metastases was 52%, whereas it was 36% for patients with bone metastases without bone marrow involvement. Among the 23 patients with bone marrow metastases, only one survived. The multivariate analysis for both EFS and for OS identified three independent prognostic factors: age, fever at diagnosis, and bone marrow involvement. Conclusion Compared with conventional chemotherapy, HDCT may yield benefits for patients with lung-only metastases or bone metastases. These results warrant confirmation in a randomized trial and provide part of the background data for the ongoing Euro-Ewing study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据