4.6 Article

Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and bone mineral density in postmenopausal Indian women

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 55, 期 1, 页码 27-35

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2006.01.003

关键词

VDR polymorphism; BMD; osteoporosis; Indian women

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Osteoporosis is a common condition in postmenopausal women. Bone mineral density (BMD), the major determinant of osteoporotic fracture risk, has a particular genetic background. However, consensus on the association of BMD with specific gene locus has not been reached. The race and ethnicity specific divergence in association studies must be assessed to predict the susceptibility and therapeutic response of associated genes. We investigated the potential association of Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms ApaI, BsmI, FokI and TaqI with BMD in 246 postmenopausal Indian women (average age 54.2 +/- 3.4 years). Methods: The subjects were genotyped by PCR-RFLP and underwent BMD measurements at spine and hip by dual energy X-ray absorptiometery. Results: The average BMD at spine and hip of women with genotypes aa, bb (presence of restriction sites for ApaI and BsmI), FF and TT (absence of restriction sites for FokI and TaqI) was more than 10% higher than those with genotypes AA, BB, ff and tt, respectively. The interaction between BsmI, ApaI and TaqI genotypes showed significant effect of BsmI-ApaI genotypes (p=0.052) in this combination on BMD. However, presence of T allele in combination showed positive influence on BMD. Within the group, genotypes BB, ff and tt were significantly prevalent in women with osteoporotic bone mass, tt and BB had significantly higher adjusted odd ratio (OR) for age more than 55years. Conclusion: Study reveals that VDR gene polymorphisms are associated with BMD in Indian women and perhaps, influence some determinant of bone metabolism. Ethnicity may attribute to frequency variation, however, allele impact remains same. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据