4.7 Article

Shear flow past two-dimensional droplets pinned or moving on an adhering channel wall at moderate Reynolds numbers: a numerical study

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 561, 期 -, 页码 439-463

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112006000954

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerical simulations are presented of shear flow past two-dimensional droplets adhering to a wall, at moderate Reynolds numbers. The results were obtained using a level-set method to track the interface, with measures to eliminate any errors in the conservation of mass of droplets. First, the case of droplets whose contact lines are pinned is considered. Data are presented for the critical value of the dimensionless shear rate (Weber number, We), beyond which no steady state is found, as a function of Reynolds number, Re. We and Re are based on the initial height of the droplet and shear rate; the range of Reynolds numbers simulated is Re <= 25. It is shown that, as Re is increased, the critical value We(c) changes from We(c) proportional to Re to We(c) approximate to const., and that the deformation of droplets at We just above We(c) changes fundamentally from a gradual to a sudden dislodgement. In the second part of the paper, drops are considered whose contact lines are allowed to move. The contact-line singularity is removed by using a Navier-slip boundary condition. It is shown that macroscale contact angles can be defined that are primarily functions of the capillary number based on the contact-line speed, instead of the value of We of the shear flow. It is shown that a Cox-Voinov-type expression can be used to describe the motion of the downstream contact line. A qualitatively different relation is tested for the motion of the upstream contact line. In a third part of this paper, results are presented for droplets moving on a wall with position-dependent sliplength or contact-angle hysteresis window, in an effort to stabilize or destabilize the drop.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据