4.7 Article

Clonal relationships among Clostridium perfringens of porcine origin as determined by multilocus sequence typing

期刊

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
卷 116, 期 1-3, 页码 158-165

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.03.025

关键词

Clostridium perfringens; MLST; enteric disease; pig; virulence genes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clostridium perfringens is ubiquitous in the environment and the intestinal tracts of most mammals, but this organism also causes gas gangrene and enteritis in human and animal hosts. While expression of specific toxins correlates with specific disease in certain hosts, the other factors involved in commensalism and host pathogenesis have not been clearly identified. A multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme was developed for C perfringens with the aim of grouping isolates with respect to disease presentation and/or host preference. Sequence data were obtained from one virulence and seven housekeeping genes for 132 C perfringens isolates that comprised all five toxin types and were isolated from 10 host species. Eighty sequence types (STs) were identified, with the majority (75%) containing only one isolate. eBLJRST analysis identified three clonal complexes, which contained 59.1% of the isolates. Clonal complex (CC) I contained 3 1, predominantly type A isolates from diverse host species. Clonal complex 2 contained 75% of the bovine type E isolates examined in this study. Clonal complex 3 consisted predominantly of porcine type A and type C isolates. Interestingly, these porcine isolates (n = 32) all carried consensus cpb2 and cna genes, encoding beta2 toxin and CpCna, a collagen binding protein, respectively. This compares to carriage of both these genes by only 3.6% of porcine isolates not present in clonal complex 3 (n = 28). The data obtained indicates that MLST may be used to identify host species relationships with respect to these C. perfringens isolates. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据