4.6 Article

Successful islet transplantation from nonheartbeating donor pancreata using modified Ricordi islet isolation method

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 82, 期 4, 页码 460-465

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000231710.37981.64

关键词

islet transplantation; islet isolation; nonheartbeating donor; ET-Kyoto solution; iodixanol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Current success of islet transplantation has led to donor shortage and the need for marginal donor utilization to alleviate this shortage. The goal of this study was to improve the efficacy of islet transplantation using nonheartbeating donors (NHBDs). Methods. First, we used porcine pancreata for the implementation of several strategies and applied to human pancreata. These strategies included ductal injection with trypsin inhibitor for protection of pancreatic ducts, ET-Kyoto solution for pancreas preservation, and Iodixanol for islet purification. Results. These strategies significantly improved both porcine and human islet isolation efficacy. Average 399,469 +/- 36,411 IE human islets were obtained from NHBDs (n = 13). All islet preparations met transplantation criteria and 11 out of 13 cases (85%) were transplanted into six type I diabetic patients for the first time in Japan. All islets started to secrete insulin and all patients showed better blood glucose control without hypoglycemic loss of consciousness. The average HbA1c levels of the six recipients significantly improved from 7.5 +/- 0.4% at transplant to 5.1 +/- 0.2% currently (P < 0.0003). The average insulin amounts of the six recipients significantly reduced from 49.2 +/- 33 units at transplant to 11 +/- 4.4 units (P < 0.0005) and five out of six patients reduced to less than half dose. The first patient is now insulin free, the first such case in Japan. Conclusion. This demonstrates that our current protocol makes it feasible to use NHBDs for islet transplant into type I diabetic patients efficiently.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据