4.7 Article

Cluster observations of broadband electromagnetic waves in and around a reconnection region in the Earth's magnetotail current sheet

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 33, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2006GL027066

关键词

-

资金

  1. NERC [bas010021] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [bas010021] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] We present an analysis of the electric and magnetic wave spectra on kinetic scales during several crossings of a reconnecting current sheet. The spectra were measured from 1 Hz or less up to 4096 Hz by the EFW, FGM and STAFF instruments onboard the Cluster spacecraft between 3 and 4 UT on 11 October 2001. During the event plasma flows of order of the local Alfven speed reversed from tailward to earthward, suggesting that a reconnection site moved over the spacecraft. We ordered the observed electric and magnetic field wave spectrum by the position within the current sheet using the magnitude of the magnetic field B. We found that the electric and magnetic wave power decreased considerably at all frequencies towards the center of the current sheet (B approximate to 0 nT). The electric energy density decreases 5 orders of magnitude from the edge of the current sheet (B = 19 nT) to the center and the magnetic energy density peaks within the current sheet ( B = 13 nT) and is decreased by 2.5 orders of magnitude at the center. Within the current sheet, the electric and magnetic wave spectra were dominantly broadband electromagnetic noise (i.e., power law spectra with exponents approximate to -1.4 and approximate to -2.4, respectively) throughout the frequency range similar to 0.1 - 1000 Hz, spanning from MHD (i.e., ion cyclotron frequency approximate to 0.2 Hz) to almost the electron plasma frequency (approximate to 4000 Hz). We argue that the wave activity is likely to be whistler wave turbulence and discuss the implications of these results for reconnection from wave-particle interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据