4.5 Article

Early or Recurrent Preterm Birth and Maternal Cardiovascular Disease Risk

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 604-609

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.05.007

关键词

Premature Birth; Cardiovascular Disease; Pregnancy; Women

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council [271-05-0616]
  2. RAND-University of Pittsburgh Health Institute
  3. Magee Womens Research Institute
  4. Danish Cancer Society [DP04127]
  5. NIH [BIRCWH-K12HD043441-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: Preterm birth (PTB) has been associated with a later increased risk of maternal cardiovascular disease (CVD). We hypothesized a more pronounced relation between early or recurrent PTB and maternal CVD risk. METHODS: We related PTB severity (earlier gestational age at delivery) and recurrence (>= 2) among women with births from 1973-1983 in Denmark (n = 427,765) to maternal CVD morbidity or mortality (1977-2006). Birth data were linked to CVD hospitalizations and deaths identified in national registers and data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Women with a prior PTB had excess CVD after adjustment for age, parity, and education (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.36 [95% confidence interval (Cl): 1.31, 1.41]). This was only modestly attenuated when women with preeclampsia or small for gestational age births were excluded, and the relationship was stronger for CVD mortality (HR = 1.98 [1.73, 2.26]). Recurrent PTB was associated with higher CVD morbidity compared to women with one PTB, particularly for ischemic events (HR = 1.78 [1.40, 2.27] vs. 1.22 [1.09, 1.36]). Risk was similarly elevated among women with early, moderate, and late PTB. Sensitivity analysis suggested that confounding by smoking only partly explained these associations. CONCLUSIONS: Women with PTB, especially recurrent PTB, were at increased risk for CVD, suggesting common causes of these conditions. Ann Epidemiol 2010;20:604-609. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据