4.6 Article

Antiviral potency of APOBEC proteins does not correlate with cytidine deamination

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 80, 期 17, 页码 8450-8458

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00839-06

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0401570] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [G0401570] Funding Source: Medline
  3. MRC [G0401570] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human cytidine deaminases APOBEC3G (hA3G) and APOBEC3F (hA3F) are intracellular antiretroviral factors that can hypermutate nascent reverse transcripts and inhibit the replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Both enzymes have two cytidine deaminase motifs, although only the C-terminal motif is catalytic. Current models of APOBEC protein function imply editing is the principal mechanism of antiviral activity. In particular, hA3G is a more potent inhibitor of HIV-1 infectivity than hA3F and also induces a greater frequency of mutations in HIV-1 cDNA. We used hA3G/hA3F chimeric proteins to investigate whether cytidine deaminase potential reflects antiviral potency. We show here that the origin of the C-terminal deaminase motif is sufficient to determine the degree of mutation induced in a bacterial assay that measures mutations in chromosomal DNA. In contrast, this was not the case in the context of HIV-1 infection where the N-terminal deaminase motif also modulated the editing capabilities of the chimeras. Surprisingly, although three of the chimeric proteins induced levels of mutation that approximated those of parental hA3F, they displayed lower levels of antiviral activity. Most importantly, real-time PCR experiments revealed that the quantity of reverse transcripts detected in target cells, rather than the mutational burden carried by such DNAs, corresponded closely with viral infectivity. In other words, the antiviral phenotype of APOBEC proteins correlates with their ability to prevent the accumulation of reverse transcripts and not with the induction of hypermutation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据