4.4 Article

The response of the novel pro-inflammatory molecules S100A8/A9 to exercise

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 751-758

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-872909

关键词

acute phase reaction; leucocytosis; treadmill; marathon; inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exercise shares many similarities with the acute phase response of inflammatory diseases. Recently, elevated serum levels of the novel pro-inflammatory molecules of the S100 protein family, S10OA8 and S10OA9, have been associated with various inflammatory diseases. The present study was conducted to assess their potential roles as inflammatory markers in monitoring the exercise-induced immune response. Seventeen male subjects of different training status performed a marathon run. Furthermore 13 subjects (10 male, 3 female) performed three different treadmill tests: strenuous (STE), moderate (MTE), and downhill (DTE). S10OA8/A9 complexes were measured by ELISA, while white blood cell count (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were used as markers of the inflammatory response. Serum creatine kinase (CK) concentration was determined as a marker for muscle damage. After marathon S10OA8/A9 increased dramatically during the early post-exercise period and returned to resting levels one day after the run. A similar pattern was found for WBC, while CK and CRP reached their maximum on the day after the run. Moreover, S10OA8/A9 release was higher in the subgroup of well-trained athletes. The kinetic of the S100AS/A9 release after the treadmill tests depended on exercise intensity and was prolonged after eccentric exercise. In summary, the present results indicate that the novel pro-inflammatory molecules S10OA8/A9 are very early and sensitive markers of the exercise-induced inflammatory response. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate the applicability of S10OA8/A9 for monitoring the training process and to elucidate the dependence on training status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据