4.6 Article

The effect of changes in adiposity on testosterione levels in older men: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 155, 期 3, 页码 443-452

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.02241

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Changes in adiposity affecting total testosterone (TT) and free testosterone (FT) levels have not been examined in a population-based survey. We aimed to determine whether changes in adiposity predict follow-up levels and rates of change in TT, FT and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) in men. Design: The Massachusetts Male Aging Study is a randomly sampled, population-based cohort interviewed at baseline (T-1, 1987-1989; n = 1709; aged 40-70 years) and followed-up approximately 9 years later (T-2, 1995-1997; n=1156). Men were categorized as overweight (body mass index (BMI) >= 25 kg/m(2)) or having obesity (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)), waist obesity (waist circumference >= 102 cm), or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) obesity (WHR > 0.95). For each adiposity group, we constructed four categories to represent changes between T-1 and T-2: overweight (or obese, etc.) at neither wave, T-1 only, T2 only, or both waves. Results: After adjustment for confounding variables, men who were overweight at T-2 only, or at both waves, had significantly lower mean T-2 TT and SHBG levels than men in the neither group (P < 0.05). Mean FT did not differ between any overweight group and the neither group. Men who were obese at both times, had the highest mean BMI, the highest fraction of severely obese men, and significantly greater rate of decline in FT than the neither group. Conclusions: In men who become overweight, the greater rate of decline in TT, but not FT, is related mostly to a lesser age-related increase in SHBG. Since weight gain is highly prevalent in older men, over-reliance on TT levels in the diagnosis of androgen deficiency could result in substantial misclassification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据