4.6 Article

Erectile dysfunction - An observable marker of diabetes mellitus? A large national epidemiological study

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 176, 期 3, 页码 1081-1085

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.082

关键词

impotence; diabetes mellitus; risk factors; managed care programs; epidemiologic studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We examined whether men with erectile dysfunction are more likely to have diabetes mellitus than men without erectile dysfunction, and whether erectile dysfunction can be used as an observable early marker of diabetes mellitus. Materials and Methods: Using a nationally representative managed care claims database from 51 health plans and 28 million members in the United States, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare the prevalence rates of diabetes mellitus between men with erectile dysfunction (285,436) and men without erectile dysfunction (1,584,230) during 1995 to 2001. Logistic regression models were used to isolate the effect of erectile dysfunction on the likelihood of having diabetes mellitus with adjustment for age, region and 7 concurrent diseases. Results: The diabetes mellitus prevalence rates were 20.0% in men with erectile dysfunction and 1.5% in men without erectile dysfunction. With adjustment for age, region and concurrent diseases, the odds ratio of having diabetes mellitus between men with erectile dysfunction and without erectile dysfunction was 1.60 (p < 0.0001). With adjustment for regions and concurrent diseases, the age specific odds ratios ranged from 2.94 (p < 0.0001, age 26 to 35) to 1.05 (p = 0.1717, age 76 to 85). Conclusions: Men with erectile dysfunction were more than twice as likely to have diabetes mellitus as men without erectile dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction is an observable marker of diabetes mellitus, strongly so for men 45 years old or younger and likely for men 46 to 65 years old, but it is not a marker for men older than 66 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据