4.2 Article

Chronic ethanol consumption inhibits hepatic natural killer cell activity and accelerates murine cytomegalovirus-induced hepatitis

期刊

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 1615-1623

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00194.x

关键词

ethanol; hepatitis; NK cells; poly I : C; MCMV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic alcohol drinking accelerates the progression of liver disease in patients with hepatitis viral infection; however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Methods: Here, we examined the effects of chronic ethanol feeding on hepatic natural killer (NK) cells and liver injury in 2 murine models of liver injury: injection of synthetic double-stranded RNA polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C), which mimics viral infection, and infection with murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV). Mice were fed the Lieber-DeCarli liquid diet containing 5% (vol/vol) ethanol for 8 weeks, resulting in a significant decrease in the percentage and total number of NK cells in the liver. Results: In control, pair-fed mice, poly I:C injection induced NK cell accumulation in the liver and activated hepatic NK cell cytotoxicity, whereas such induction and activation were diminished in ethanol-fed mice. Treatment with poly I:C also induced expression of NKG2D, granzyme B, perforin, Fas L, TRAIL, and IFN-gamma on liver lymphocytes, which were delayed or reduced in ethanol-treated mice compared with pair-fed mice. In contrast, chronic ethanol feeding did not affect poly I:C-induced mild liver injury. Furthermore, MCMV infection activated hepatic NK cells and induced hepatic inflammation and injury. Chronic ethanol consumption inhibited hepatic NK cell activation during MCMV infection, but enhanced MCMV-induced liver injury, viral titer, and inflammation in the liver. Conclusions: Taken together, these findings suggest that chronic ethanol consumption decreases hepatic NK activity, thereby accelerating MCMV-induced hepatitis and liver injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据