4.7 Article

Determination of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in cerebrospinal fluid of paediatric patients:: Reference values for a paediatric population

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 371, 期 1-2, 页码 159-162

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.03.004

关键词

cerebral folate deficiency; 5-methyltetrahydrofolate; blood-CSF brain barrier; total proteins; neurotransmitters; paediatric patients

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cerebral folate deficiency (CFD) has been described as a neurological syndrome associated with low 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) values in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with normal folate concentrations in plasma. Our aim was to analyse CSF 5-MTHF concentrations in a paediatric control population and in patients with various neurological disorders. Methods: We studied plasma and CSF samples from 63 paediatric controls (age range: 2 days to 18 years, average: 3.8 years) and from 165 patients (age range: 1 day to 22 years, average: 5.0 years) with severe epileptic encephalopathies of unknown origin, movement disorders, Rett syndrome and mitochondrial diseases. CSF 5-methyltetrahydrofolate was analysed by reverse phase HPLC with fluorescence detection (excitation: 295 nm and emission: 355 nm). Result: A negative correlation between 5-MTHF values and age of controls was observed (r= - 0.468; p < 0.0001) and reference values were therefore stratified into 3 age groups. Regarding patients, 122 out of 165 showed normal CSF 5-MTHF values while 43 showed decreased values ranging from profound to mild deficiencies. Increased CSF total protein values were associated with the presence of low 5-MTHF concentrations (chi(2) = 7.796; p = 0.005). Conclusions: The application of this method has been useful for the establishment of reference values and for diagnosis of CFD in paediatric patients. Furthermore, increased CSF total protein concentrations should be considered as a marker of a possible CFD. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据