4.5 Article

Non-muscle myosins 2A and 2B drive changes in cell morphology that occur as myoblasts align and fuse

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 119, 期 17, 页码 3561-3570

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.03096

关键词

non-muscle myosin; myoblasts; fusion; antisense; muscle; electron microscopy

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D524875/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. BBSRC [BB/D524875/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D524875/1] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction of non-muscle myosins 2A and 2B with actin may drive changes in cell movement, shape and adhesion. To investigate this, we used cultured myoblasts as a model system. These cells characteristically change shape from triangular to bipolar when they form groups of aligned cells. Antisense oligonucleotide knockdown of nonmuscle myosin 2A, but not non-muscle myosin 2B, inhibited this shape change, interfered with cell-cell adhesion, had a minor effect on tail retraction and prevented myoblast fusion. By contrast, non-muscle myosin 2B knockdown markedly inhibited tail retraction, increasing cell length by over 200% by 72 hours compared with controls. In addition it interfered with nuclei redistribution in myotubes. Nonmuscle myosin 2C is not involved as western analysis showed that it is not expressed in myoblasts, but only in myotubes. To understand why non-muscle myosins 2A and 2B have such different roles, we analysed their distributions by immuno-electron microscopy, and found that nonmuscle myosin 2A was more tightly associated with the plasma membrane than non-muscle myosin 2B. This suggests that non-muscle myosin 2A is more important for bipolar shape formation and adhesion owing to its preferential interaction with membrane-associated actin, whereas the role of non-muscle myosin 2B in retraction prevents over-elongation of myoblasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据