4.5 Article

Hospitalization attributable to influenza and other viral respiratory illnesses in Canadian children

期刊

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 795-800

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000232632.86800.8c

关键词

influenza; hospitalization; child; population-based; RSV; para-influenza virus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We sought to estimate the incidence of hospitalization attributable to influenza virus infection in Canadian children while controlling for the impact of other respiratory viruses. Methods: Hospital admissions for children and youth 0 to 19 years of age, 1994-2000, were modeled as a function of proxy variables for influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and other respiratory viral activity, seasonality and trend, using a Poisson regression model with a linear link. These proxy variables were developed from influenza mortality and laboratory test results for influenza, RSV and other viruses. Various checks for consistency, model fit and robustness were conducted and guided model development. Results: Overall, 1.5% of all pediatric respiratory admissions could be attributed to influenza (18 admissions per 100,000 per year). The largest burden was seen in infants 6 to 11 months of age with rates of 200 per 100,000 infants and approximately equivalent to the rate for adults aged 65 to 69. During peak influenza activity, 7% of respiratory admissions were attributable to influenza as were 35% of febrile seizure admissions. RSV and parainfluenza (PIV) were the major viral causes of hospital admission with rates of 130 and 160 per 100,000, respectively. Another 70 per 100,000 admissions were attributed to other influenza-like illnesses. Conclusions: Influenza is a significant cause of morbidity leading to hospitalization in Canadian children, particularly for those under 2 years of age. RSV, PIV and other respiratory viruses were found to be major causes of respiratory illness leading to hospital care, surpassing influenza.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据