4.5 Article

High-tide habitat choice: insights from modelling roost selection by shorebirds around a tropical bay

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 563-575

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.10.029

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High tides force shorebirds from intertidal feeding areas to sites known as roosts. We investigated the roost selection of great knots, Calidris tenuirostris, and red knots, Calidris canutus, on a tropical coastline in northwestern Australia, assessing several roost attributes and recording the frequency of use of each site through automatic radiotelemetry. To model roost choice we used two approaches: (1) conditional logistic regression models that assumed roost selection to be a trade-off based on a probabilistic assessment of several environmental characteristics; and (2) bounds-based models that assumed that birds selected the nearest roost site to their feeding grounds, provided that threshold values for certain environmental characteristics were met. Bounds-based models were more effective, and we suggest that they offer a closer approach to real roost choice mechanisms. By day, roost choice was affected by distance from the feeding area and microclimate; birds selected nearby roosts where they could stand on cool, wet substrates. Different roost selection criteria were used at night when birds chose safer, but more distant, roosts. Models that assumed that roost choice was influenced by recent experience of roost sites performed better than models that assumed constant assessment of roost quality. This effect was significant only at night, suggesting that memory was used more when information on roost quality was limited. Evidence that roost availability may influence selection of foraging areas is also presented. Our results suggest that shorebirds select roosts by using simple mechanisms, making roost choice models a potentially valuable tool in conservation planning. (c) 2006 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据