4.7 Article

Functional pathway-defined MRI diffusion measures reveal increased transverse diffusivity of water in multiple sclerosis

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 1127-1133

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.208

关键词

multiple sclerosis; diffusion tensor imaging; functional MRI; DTI tractography; white matter; motor cortex; corpus callosum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diffusion properties of water are sensitive to microscopic changes in the white matter of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Typical MRI measures of disease burden in MS demonstrate modest to poor correlation with disability. Functional MRI and DTI-based fiber tracking were used to define the interhemispheric white matter pathway connecting bilateral supplementary motor areas (SMA) in 16 MS patients sand 16 control subjects. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), longitudinal (lambda(1)) and transverse diffusivity (lambda(2)) were measured along this pathway in all subjects. Mean FA was 0.587 +/- 0.032 for patients and 0.608 +/- 0.020 for controls (P < 0.02). Mean MD was (0.821 +/- 0.055) x 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1) for patients and (0.770 +/- 0.020) x 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1) for controls (P < 0.004). Mean A, values were (1.462 +/- 0.099) X 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1) for patients and (1.400 +/- 0.034) x 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1) for controls (P < 0.02). Mean lambda(2) values were (0.500 +/- 0.047) x 10(-3) min(2) s(-1) for patients and (0.454 +/- 0.027) x 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1) for controls (P < 0.001). In addition, the correlation between the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and transverse diffusivity was -0.341 (P < 0.05). The component test of the MSFC most related to the SMA pathway studied with our MRI method (Nine-hole Peg Test) showed significant correlation with transverse diffusivity (r = 0.392, P < 0.02), indicating that probing functional pathways with MRI measures can lead to a better reflection of disease status. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据