4.7 Article

X-ray galaxy clusters in NoSOCS: Substructure and the correlation of optical and X-ray properties

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 648, 期 1, 页码 209-229

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/505630

关键词

catalogs; galaxies : clusters : general; X-rays : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a comparison of optical and X-ray properties of galaxy clusters in the northern sky, using literature data from BAX and optically selected clusters in DPOSS. We determine the recovery rate of X-ray-detected clusters in the optical as a function of richness, redshift, and X-ray luminosity, showing that the missed clusters are typically low-contrast systems when observed optically (either poor or at high redshifts). We employ four different statistical tests to test for the presence of substructure using optical two-dimensional data. We find that approximately 35% of the clusters show strong signs of substructure in the optical. However, the results are test-dependent, with variations also due to the magnitude range and radius utilized. We have also performed a comparison of X-ray luminosity and temperature with optical galaxy counts (richness). We find that the slope and scatter of the relations between richness and the X-ray properties are heavily dependent on the density contrast of the clusters. The selection of substructure-free systems does not improve the correlation between X-ray luminosity and richness, but this comparison also shows much larger scatter than one obtained using the X-ray temperature. In the latter case, the sample is significantly reduced because temperature measurements are available only for the most massive (and thus high-contrast) systems. However, the comparison between temperature and richness is very sensitive to the exclusion of clusters showing signs of substructure. The correlation of X-ray luminosity and richness is based on the largest sample to date (similar to 750 clusters), while tests involving temperature use a similar number of objects as previous works (less than or similar to 100). The results presented here are in good agreement with existing literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据