4.6 Article

Neighborhood disadvantage as a risk factor for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 149, 期 3, 页码 342-347

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.061

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR 00080] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL 60957, K23 HL 04426] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [5T32 HD 041923] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINR NIH HHS [R01 NR 02707] Funding Source: Medline
  5. PHS HHS [R01 070916] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Low, socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a range of health outcomes. Our objective was to study the relationship between residence in a neighborhood of severe socioeconomic disadvantage and childhood obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Study design Cross-sectional analysis of 843 (49% female, 36% African-American) children 8 to 11 years of age from a community-based cohort. Data on neighborhood conditions were obtained from the 2000 US Census. The main outcome measure was OSA, defined as an obstructive apnea hypopnea index > 5 events per hour or an obstructive apnea index > 1 event per hour. Results Residence in a neighborhood of severe socioeconomic disadvantage was significantly associated with OSA after adjusting for effects of previously established risk factors: premature birth, obesity, and African-American ethnicity (OR = 3.44, 95% Cl = 1.53-7.75). Secondary analyses showed that neighborhood disadvantage remained significantly associated with OSA: (1) in the African-American subgroup, after controlling for effects of prematurity and obesity; and (2) after controlling for indicators of household-level SES or other health characteristics. Conclusions Childhood OSA is associated with low SES as measured by an index describing severe neighborhood disadvantage, emphasizing the potential importance of environmental factors, particularly those associated with neighborhood distress, as risk factors for OSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据