4.4 Review

Constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials: A tutorial review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY
卷 115, 期 16, 页码 1032-1050

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qua.24890

关键词

neural network potentials; molecular dynamics

资金

  1. Cluster of Excellence RESOLV - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EXC 1069]
  2. Emmy Noether program of the DFG [BE3264/3-1]
  3. Heisenberg fellowship of the DFG [BE3264/6-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A lot of progress has been made in recent years in the development of atomistic potentials using machine learning (ML) techniques. In contrast to most conventional potentials, which are based on physical approximations and simplifications to derive an analytic functional relation between the atomic configuration and the potential-energy, ML potentials rely on simple but very flexible mathematical terms without a direct physical meaning. Instead, in case of ML potentials the topology of the potential-energy surface is learned by adjusting a number of parameters with the aim to reproduce a set of reference electronic structure data as accurately as possible. Due to this bias-free construction, they are applicable to a wide range of systems without changes in their functional form, and a very high accuracy close to the underlying first-principles data can be obtained. Neural network potentials (NNPs), which have first been proposed about two decades ago, are an important class of ML potentials. Although the first NNPs have been restricted to small molecules with only a few degrees of freedom, they are now applicable to high-dimensional systems containing thousands of atoms, which enables addressing a variety of problems in chemistry, physics, and materials science. In this tutorial review, the basic ideas of NNPs are presented with a special focus on developing NNPs for high-dimensional condensed systems. A recipe for the construction of these potentials is given and remaining limitations of the method are discussed. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据