4.3 Article

Functional division of intrinsic neurons in the mushroom bodies of male Spodoptera littoralis revealed by antibodies against aspartate, taurine, FMRF-amide, Mas-allatotropin and DC0

期刊

ARTHROPOD STRUCTURE & DEVELOPMENT
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 153-168

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2006.03.001

关键词

insect brain; immunocytology; amino acid; neuropeptide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to further reveal the organization of Kenyon cells in the mushroom body calyx and lobes of the male moth Spodoptera littoralis, by using immunocytochemical labeling. Subdivisions of the mushroom bodies were identified employing antisera raised against the amino acids taurine and aspartate, the neuropeptides FMRF-amide and Mas-allatotropin, and against the protein kinase A catalytic subunit DC0. These antisera have previously been shown to label subsets of Kenyon cells in other species. The present results show that the organization of the mushroom body lobes into discrete divisions, described from standard neuroanatomical methods, is confirmed by immunocytology and shown to be further elaborated. Anti-taurine labels the accessory Y-tract, the gamma division of the lobes, and a thin subdivision of the most posterior component of the lobes. Aspartate antiserum labels the entire mushroom body. FMRF-amide-like immunolabeling is pronounced in the gamma division and in the anterior perimeter of the alpha/beta and alpha'/beta' divisions. Mas-allatotropin-like immumolabeling shows the opposite of FMRF-amide-like and taurine-like immunolabeling: the gamma division and the accessory Y-system is immunonegative whereas strong labeling is seen in both the alpha/beta and alpha'/beta' divisions. The present results agree with findings from other insects that mushroom bodies are anatomically divided into discrete parallel units. Functional and developmental implications of this organization are discussed. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据