4.5 Article

Estrogen-like response to p-nonylphenol in human first trimester placenta and BeWo choriocarcinoma cells

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 75-81

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl043

关键词

p-nonylphenol; endocrine disruptors; estrogen receptors; human placenta; human chorionic gonadotropin; trophoblast apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

p-Nonylphenol (p-NP) is a metabolite of alkylphenol ethoxylates used as surfactants in the manufacturing industry. Although it is reported to have estrogenic activity and to be transferred from the mother to the embryo, no data are available on its effects on the development of the human placenta. In the present study, we investigated estrogen receptors' (ERs) expression in the first trimester human placenta. Using an in vitro model of chorionic villous explants, we then compared the effects of p-NP and 17 beta-estradiol (17 beta-E2). Finally, a trophoblast-derived choriocarcinoma cell line, BeWo, was used as a model of trophoblast cell differentiation. Our results showed that the first trimester placenta expresses three ER-alpha isoforms of 67, 46, and 39 kDa and one ER-beta isoform of 55 kDa. Immunohistochemistry revealed the expression of ER-alpha in the villous cytotrophoblast, whereas ER-beta was mainly expressed by the syncytiotrophoblast. Treatment of explant cultures with p-NP (10(-9)M) and 17 beta-E2 (10-9M) significantly increased beta-hCG secretion and cell apoptosis but did not modify ER expression. After 72 h of exposure, hormone release was significantly higher in beta-NP- than 17 beta-E2-treated explant cultures. By this time, cleavage of caspase-3 was evident in cultures treated with 17 beta-E2 and p-NP. In BeWo cells, a caspase-3 band of 20-16 kDa was evident after I h of treatment with p-NP and after 24 h of treatment with 17 beta-E2 or forskolin. These findings suggest that the human trophoblast may be highly responsive to p-NP and raise concern about maternal exposure in early gestation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据