4.7 Article

DHEAS levels and mortality in disabled older women: The Women's Health and Aging Study I

出版社

GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY AMER
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/61.9.957

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 AG999999] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R37 AG019905, R37-AG19905, K23 AG19161, R01-AG11703, R01 AG011703, N01-AG-1-2112, K23 AG019161] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) is an endogenously produced sex steroid that has been hypothesized to have anti-aging effects. Low DHEAS levels are associated with mortality in older men, but the relationship between DHEAS levels and mortality in women is not clearly defined. Methods. The relationship between serum DHEAS level and 5-year mortality was analyzed in a cohort of 539 disabled women aged 65-100 years enrolled in the Women's Health and Aging Study I (WHAS I). Using Cox proportional hazard models, we calculated multivariate-adjusted mortality risks by DHEAS quartiles and by DHEAS continuously, allowing for a nonlinear relationship. We also examined cause-specific mortality. Results. We found a U-shaped relationship between DHEAS level and mortality. After adjusting for multiple covariates, women in the top and bottom DHEAS quartiles had a more than 2-fold higher 5-year mortality than did those in the middle quartiles (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-3.98 for the top quartile and 2.05; 95% CI, 1.27-3.32 for the bottom quartile, each compared to the third quartile). Women with higher DHEAS levels tended to have greater cancer mortality, whereas those with lower DHEAS tended to have greater cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion. Disabled older women with either low or high levels of DHEAS are at greater risk for death than are those with intermediate levels. More research is needed to determine if targeted dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation would provide clinical benefit to disabled older women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据