4.4 Article

Early destruction of tumor vasculature in tumor necrosis factor-α-based isolated limb perfusion is responsible for tumor response

期刊

ANTI-CANCER DRUGS
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 949-959

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.cad.0000224450.54447.b3

关键词

apoptosis; interstitial fluid pressure; isolated limb perfusion; leukocyte infiltration; tumor necrosis factor-alpha; vascular damage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Addition of high-dose tumor necrosis factor-alpha to melphalan-based isolated limb perfusion enhances anti-tumor effects impressively. Unfortunately, the mechanism of action of tumor necrosis factor-alpha is still not fully understood. Here, we investigated the effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha on the tumor microenvironment and on secondary immunological events during and shortly after isolated limb perfusion in soft-tissue sarcoma-bearing rats. Already during isolated limb perfusion, softening of the tumor was observed. Co-administration of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the isolated limb perfusion with melphalan induced a six-fold enhanced drug accumulation of melphalan in the tumor compared with isolated limb perfusion with melphalan alone. In addition, directly after perfusion with tumor necrosis factor-alpha plus melphalan, over a time-frame of 30 min, vascular destruction, erythrocyte extravasation and hemorrhage was detected. Interstitial fluid pressure and pH in the tumor, however, were not altered by tumor necrosis factor-alpha and no clear immune effects, cellular infiltration or cytokine expression were observed. Taken together, these results indicate that tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces rapid damage to the tumor vascular endothelial lining resulting in augmented drug accumulation. As other important parameters were not changed (e.g. interstitial fluid pressure and pH), we speculate that the tumor vascular changes, and concurrent hemorrhage and drug accumulation are the key explanations for the observed synergistic anti-tumor response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据