4.5 Article

Endometrial cancer risk is associated with variants of the mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 1636-1640

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0257

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Women with germ-line mutations in the mismatch repair genes (responsible for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) face an increased risk of colonic and endometrial cancer. However, these germ-line mutations are rare and are responsible for fewer than 1% of endometrial cancers. Therefore, we examined whether or not common variants of the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer-associated genes might also be associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms were selected in the MLH1 and MSH2 mismatch repair genes. All the various 672 women with endometrial cancer and 880 controls were genotyped. Each of these three single-nucleotide polymorphisms was associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. Carriers of the MLH1 nt-93 A allele were at a 1.5-fold increased risk of developing endometrial cancer compared with controls [95% confidence interval (95% CD, 1.2-2.0; P = 0.001]. The risk was higher for homozygote carriers [odds ratio (OR), 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2; P = 0.009]. For carriers of the MSH2 rs2303428 C allele, the OR was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0-1.9; P = 0.05), and for carriers of the MSH2 rs2059520 G allele, the OR was 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.7; P = 0.03). More than 9% of endometrial cancer cases carried a variant allele in both MLH1 and MSH2. For these women, the risk of endometrial cancer was particularly high (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.6; P = 0.005). For patients younger than 50 years at diagnosis who carried both variants, the risk was even higher (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-6.6; P = 0.0005). In summary, two common variant alleles of the MLH1 and MSH2 genes make a substantial contribution to endometrial cancer incidence in Ontario.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据