4.5 Article

MRT letter: High speed scanning has the potential to increase fluorescence yield and to reduce photobleaching

期刊

MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 689-692

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20363

关键词

confocal; scanning; microscopy; scan speed; triplet state; fluorescence yield; photobleaching

向作者/读者索取更多资源

True confocal microscopy requires point-shaped illumination and detection. To generate an image, a diffraction limited spot is moved over the sample. Single spot scanning has suffered in the past from low image rates; a solution is the employment of very fast scanning devices (resonant scanners) for x-movement. In the process of introducing resonant scanning devices, it was found that both signal yield is improved and bleaching is decreased-in contrary to the assumed performance. This article will show by a simple and well understood model a straightforward explanation for the potential increase of signal yield and decrease in photobleaching. The time that is ruling the dose-rate effects is the effective time; a fluorochrome is illuminated. This time depends on the diameter of the spot that is moved over the sample and the speed at which the spot moves. In essence, the scan process causes a pulsed illumination of the fluorochromes. Various schemes of pulsed illumination are simulated with a fluorescence model. The model includes a dark state, where fluorochromes will exit the fluorescence process and slowly decay back into the ground state. Upon splitting a single dose into two pulses separated by a dark time-reflecting an increased scan speed-the amount of fluorescence emission is increased and bleaching is reduced. These results show a potential increase of fluorescence and a lower photobleaching upon higher scan speed. As illumination during the bleach-phase in a FRAP-experiment is similar to a light pulse, the findings also suggest to critically consider the very beginning of fluorescence recovery in terms of triplet relaxation process that potentially could falsify the measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据