4.7 Article

Tumor-specific expression of the RGD-α3(IV)NC1 domain suppresses endothelial tube formation and tumor growth in mice

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 11, 页码 1904-+

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.05-5565fje

关键词

adenovirus; angiogenesis; basement membrane; cancer dormancy; hTERT

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 18381] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiogenesis plays an essential role in tumor growth. This study investigated expression of the noncollagenous domain of alpha 3(IV) collagen (alpha 3(IV) NC1) transduced into tumors and its inhibition of tumor growth. We hypothesized that if a human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) promoter-driven RGD motif containing alpha 3(IV) NC1 (hTERT/ RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1) were expressed in telomerase-expressing tumor cells, it would inhibit tumor growth by its anti-angiogenic property. Adenoviral transduction of hTERT/ RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1 expressed RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1 in hTERT-positive tumor cell lines. However, hTERT/ RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1 did not express RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1 in hTERT-negative cells such as keratinocytes and fibroblasts. The secreted RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1 in the conditioned medium from tumor cells inhibited cell proliferation as well as tube formation in cultured endothelial cells, but had no effect on other types of cells. In an in vivo model, adenoviral hTERT/ RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1 gene therapy showed limited expression of RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1 in tumors and resulted in a significant decrease of vessel density in tumors. The growth of subcutaneous (s. c.) tumors in nude mice was significantly suppressed by treatment with hTERT/ RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1. In addition, long-term inhibition of tumor growth was achieved by intermittent administration of hTERT/ RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that tumor-specific antiangiogenic gene therapy utilizing RGD-alpha 3(IV) NC1 under the hTERT promoter inhibited angiogenesis in tumors, resulting in an antitumor effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据