4.6 Article

Potential use of alexidine dihydrochloride as an apoptosis-promoting anticancer agent

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 2234-2240

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0134

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite advances in surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, novel therapeutics are needed for head and neck cancer treatment. The objective of this current study was to evaluate alexidine dihydrochloride as a novel compound lead for head and neck cancers. Using a tetrazolium-based assay, the dose required to reduce cell viability by 50% (ED50) was found to be -1.8 mu mol/L in FaDu (human hypopharyngeal squamous cancer) and -2.6 mu mol/L in C666-1 (human undifferentiated nasopharyngeal cancer) cells. In contrast, the ED50 values were much higher in untransformed cells, specifically at -8.8 mu mol/L in GM05757 (primary normal human fibroblast), -8.9 mu mol/L in HNEpC (primary normal human nasal epithelial), and -19.6 mu mol/L in NIH/3T3 (mouse embryonic fibroblast) cells. Alexidine dihydrochloride did not interfere with the activities of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, or radiation, and interacted in a less-than-additive manner. DNA content analyses and Hoechst 33342 staining revealed that this compound induced apoptosis. Alexidine dihydrochloride-induced mitochondrial damage was visualized using transmission electron microscopy. Mitochondrial membrane potential (Delta Psi(M)) depolarization was detectable after only 3 hours of treatment, and was followed by cytosolic Ca2+ increase along with loss of membrane integrity/cell death. Caspase-2 and caspase-9 activities were detectable at 12 hours, caspase-8 at 24 hours, and caspase-3 at 48 hours. FaDu cell clonogenic survival was reduced to < 5% with 1 mu mol/L alexidine dihydrochloride, and, correspondingly, this compound decreased the in vivo tumor-forming potential of FaDu cells. Thus, we have identified alexidine dihydrochloride as the first bisbiguanide compound with anticancer specificity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据