3.8 Article

Before first sex: Gender differences in emotional relationships and physical behaviors among adolescents in the Philippines

期刊

INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 110-119

出版社

ALAN GUTTMACHER INST
DOI: 10.1363/3211006

关键词

-

资金

  1. FIC NIH HHS [R01-TW005596] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [K01-HD042540] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CONTEXT. Early age at first sex has been identified as a risk factor for unplanned pregnancy and HIV infection. However, the emotional relationships and physical behaviors that precede first intercourse, and how they differ by sex, also may provide important cues about how to prevent sexual risk behavior. METHODS: The precoital activities of 2051 adolescentsaged 17-19 in Cebu, Philippines, are examined using 1998-2000 and 2002 data from the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey. The timing and tempo of emotionol relationships and physical behaviors for males and females are described. Cox proportional hazards models used to identify the characteristics associated with age at first sex. RESULTS: Males engage in precoital physical behaviors and first sex at younger ages than females. Although the standard order in which the two sexes engage in emotional relationships for the first time is the some, males progress through the sequence more quickly than females. After adolescents have progressed through the sequence of emotional relationships, there is a gap of a least a year before they begin to have sex. In the multivariate analysis, rapid progression through the sequence of emotional relationships was associated with initiating sex at a younger age for females (hazard ratio, 1.5), but not for males. CONCLUSION. The period between first date and first sex experienced by both males and females provides an opportunity to ensure that adolescents have access to the information and services that will allow them to make informed choices about sexual behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据