4.2 Article

Substance use among women in shelters for abused women and children - Programming opportunities

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/BF03405348

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study explores changes in the use of alcohol and other substances by women in British Columbia as they moved into shelters for abused women and again three months later. We see this time as a key life transition, and potentially a rich opportunity for influencing women's substance use behaviour. The purpose of this study was to document changes in the level of use of alcohol and other substances and the levels of stress among women as they moved through shelters for abused women. Methods: Standardized questionnaires augmented by qualitative interviews were employed to measure alcohol and substance use, experiences of abuse, and levels and types of stressors facing women in this situation. Findings: Significant reductions in women's use of alcohol and stimulants were observed from Interview I to Interview 11, but there was no significant reduction in use of other depressants or tobacco use. Levels of stress decreased and sources of stress changed for the women after the shelter experience. Stress connected to relationship with partners had the most significant decrease, followed by mental health, housing, and legal issues. Women reported barriers to accessing financial aid and services for substance use outside of the shelter. Conclusions: Women's experiences of violence and substance use were found to be interconnected in complex ways and changes in substance use were affected by a range of influences, such as financial concerns, mothering, relationships, levels of social support, and physical and mental health issues. Substance-using women who have experienced violence are an underserved population and a multi-sectoral response designed to address psychosocial, relational, and structural issues could better help them improve their overall health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据