4.2 Article

A functional comparison of mature human dendritic cells prepared in fluorinated ethylene-propylene bags or polystyrene flasks

期刊

TRANSFUSION
卷 46, 期 9, 页码 1494-1504

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00940.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Fluorinated ethylene-propylene (FEP) bags have been used instead of polystyrene (PS) flasks for ex vivo clinical-scale production of human dendritic cells (DCs) to facilitate closed-system recovery of these highly adherent cells. To assess the impact of DC culture on this nonadherent surface, the function of DCs generated in FEP and PS was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cell yield, phenotype, cytokine production, migration, and antigen-presenting activity were measured in DCs prepared from peripheral blood monocytes in FEP bags or PS flasks with medium supplemented with serum, interleukin (IL)-4, and granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor for 5 days to induce DC differentiation and CD40L or poly(I:C) plus interferon-gamma to promote maturation. RESULTS: DCs cultured in FEP or PS had comparable cell yield, viability, and CD83 and CCR7 expression. DCs generated in FEP, however, produced significantly less IL-12 and IL-10 during maturation, and differences persisted on rechallenge after harvest. FEP-cultured DCs migrated spontaneously or in response to CCR7 ligand more actively than PS-cultured DCs, but this difference was not significant. Mature DCs prepared in FEP and PS were equipotent in stimulating peptide-specific CD8 T-cell expansion in vitro. CONCLUSOINS: FEP- and PS-cultured DCs are similar in phenotype and in some functional measures, but FEP markedly reduces DC production of IL-12 and IL-10. This phenomenon presumably reflects intracellular changes linked to the absence of a surface for firm cell adherence. Given the importance of these cytokines in the immune response, these changes could have a significant impact on DC function in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据