4.7 Article

Estimating fatty acid content in cow milk using mid-infrared spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 89, 期 9, 页码 3690-3695

出版社

AMER DAIRY SCIENCE ASSOC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72409-2

关键词

milk; fatty acid; mid-infrared; quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interest in the fatty acid composition of dairy products is increasing; however, the measurement of fatty acids requires using gas-liquid chromatography. Although this method is suitable, it involves a time-consuming procedure, expensive reagents, and qualified staff. By comparison, the mid-infrared (MIR) spectrometry method could be a good alternative for assessing the fatty acid profile of dairy products. The objective of this study was to explore the calibration of MIR spectrometry for estimating fatty acid concentrations in milk and milk fat. Estimated concentrations in milk fat were less reliable than those for the same fatty acids in milk. Results also showed that when the fatty acid concentrations in milk increased, the efficiency of the infrared analysis method in predicting these values simultaneously increased. Selected prediction equations must have a high cross-validation coefficient of determination, a high ratio of standard error of cross-validation to standard deviation, and good repeatability of chromatographic data. Results from this study showed that the calibration equations predicting 12: 0, 14: 0, 16: 0, 16: 1cis-9, 18: 1, and saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids in milk could be used. Thus, with its potential for use in regular milk recording, this infrared analysis method offers the possibility of assessing and improving the quality of milk produced. Indeed, it enables the fatty acid composition in milk to be estimated for each cow and the estimates to be used as indicator traits to determine the genetic values of underlying fatty acid concentrations. The knowledge of these genetic values would open up opportunities for animal selection aimed at improving the nutritional quality of cow milk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据