4.4 Article

Different consequences of ACE2 and SW15 gene disruptions for virulence of pathogenic and nonpathogenic yeasts

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 74, 期 9, 页码 5244-5248

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00817-06

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/B/10331] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust [076954, 072420] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/B/10331] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutants of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae with disruptions in the ACE2 gene and C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae swi5 disruption mutants were tested for virulence in a murine challenge model of disseminated yeast infection. All mutants showed a clumping phenotype, but clumping was minimized in challenge inocula by inclusion of chitinase in the growth medium. In animals rendered temporarily neutropenic by cyclophosphamide treatment, the C. glabrata ace2 null mutant was confirmed as hypervirulent: it led to early terminal illness and kidney, brain, and lung fungal burdens substantially and significantly larger than those in controls. The C. glabrata swi5 null mutant did not lead to terminal illness but generated significantly larger brain and lung burdens than those in controls. The C. albicans ace2 null mutant was very slightly attenuated and the S. cerevisiae ace2 and swi5 null mutants were substantially attenuated relative to their parental control strains. The phenotype of aggressive hypervirulence, unique to disruption of the C. glabrata ACE2 gene among the strains tested, was not seen when the C glabrata ace2 strain was tested in immunologically intact mice. The different effects seen with these mutants rule out the clumping phenotype as the explanation for hypervirulence in the C glabrata ace2 mutant. The absence of C glabrata ace2 hypervirulence in healthy mice may be a tool for definitive future study of host-parasite cross talk in microbial opportunism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据