4.5 Article

Developmental disorders in buds and needles of mature Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst., in relation to needle boron concentrations

期刊

TREES-STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 559-570

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-006-0071-5

关键词

boron deficiency; bud emergence; light microscopy; needle; Picea abies

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dieback of the terminal shoot and consequently bushy growth induced by boron deficiency have been reported widely throughout the world in several tree species. Recently, similar growth damage was documented in half of the young spruce stands in eastern Finland. To clarify the role of B deficiency, the light microscopic structure of emerging buds and of developing and previous-year needles of mature Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) from damaged (D stand), partly damaged (PD stand) and healthy (H stand) stands were analysed. The samples, on which needle nutrient concentrations were also determined, were taken seven times between early spring (April) and early winter (November). Cell death characterized by precipitation of the cell content, possibly due to the release of tannins after membrane rupture, was seen in the apex of emerging buds, and this led to fatal damage in about half of the buds in the trees from the D stand, where the needle B concentration was well below the deficiency level of 4-5 mg kg(-1). Furthermore, an increase in living cells that accumulated tannins in the vacuoles, which is a common stress and/or defense reaction, was found in the primordial shoots of buds and in the differentiating needles in the PD and D stands. The increase in the areas of the central cylinder and of the xylem found in the needles indicate structural plasticity during needle differentiation to drought. The time frame for bud emergence from late May up to mid-September means that an adequate B supply is necessary throughout the summer in order to avoid fatal bud damage and thus bushy growth of the trees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据