4.7 Article

Rifampicin/imipenem combination in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 697-700

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkl274

关键词

A. baumannii; carbapenem resistance; antibiotic combinations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In the setting of a large endemic of Acinetobacter baumannii infections, treatment of those due to carbapenem-resistant strains, susceptible only to colistin, has become a major problem in our hospital during the past years. Successful results have been reported using colistin, but clinical experience with this antibiotic is limited. In our experimental studies using these strains in a mouse pneumonia model, the best results were observed with a combination of rifampicin and imipenem. Methods: From July 2000 to September 2001, we performed a pilot study with patients suffering from serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. Patients were treated with a rifampicin/imipenem combination and followed up prospectively. Cultures were repeated during and after treatment, and in vitro activity of rifampicin was monitored. Genotyping of these strains was performed by means of PFGE. Results: Ten patients were selected: four with ventilator-associated pneumonia, and six with other infections (one catheter-related bacteraemia, five surgical infections). Three patients died, two of whom were considered therapeutic failures. In five of the seven patients who were cured, other procedures were also performed such as surgical drainage or catheter removal. In vitro development of high resistance to rifampicin was shown in seven (70%). PFGE demonstrated that initial isolates and high-resistant strains belonged to the same clones. Conclusions: The results of our study argue against the use of a rifampicin/imipenem combination for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii infections. However, combinations of rifampicin with other antibiotics merit further studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据