4.5 Article

Neutralization of the chemokine CXCL10 reduces apoptosis and increases axon sprouting after spinal cord injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 84, 期 4, 页码 724-734

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.20982

关键词

spinal cord trauma; degeneration; regeneration; IP10; brainstem; axon outgrowth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is followed by a secondary degenerative process that includes cell death. We have previously demonstrated that the chemokine CXCL10 is up-regulated following SCI and plays a critical role in T-lymphocyte recruitment to sites of injury and inhibition of angiogenesis; antibody-mediated functional blockade of CXCL10 reduced inflammation while enhancing angiogenesis. We hypothesized, based on these findings, that the injury environment established by anti-CXCL10 antibody treatment would support greater survival of neurons and enhance axon sprouting compared with the untreated, injured spinal cord. Here, we document gene array and histopathological data to support our hypothesis. Gene array analysis of treated and untreated tissue from spinal cord-injured animals revealed eight apoptosis-related genes with significant expression changes at 3 days postinjury. In support of these data, quantification of TUNEL-positive cells at 3 days postinjury indicated a 75% reduction in the number of dying cells in treated animals compared with untreated animals. Gene array analysis of treated and untreated tissue also revealed six central nervous system growth-related genes with significant expression changes in the brainstem at 14 days postinjury. In support of these data, quantification of anterograde-labeled corticospinal tract fibers indicated a 60-70% increase in axon sprouting caudal to the injury site in treated animals compared with untreated animals. These findings indicate that anti-CXCL10 antibody treatment provides an environment that reduces apoptosis and increases axon sprouting following injury to the adult spinal cord. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据