4.5 Article

Effect of aging on the recovery following contraction-induced injury in muscles of female mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 101, 期 3, 页码 887-892

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00380.2006

关键词

plantar flexor muscles; lengthening contractions; sarcopenia

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P30 AG-13283, T32 AG-00114-18] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [T90 DK-070071] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effect of aging on the recovery following contraction-induced injury in muscles of female mice. J Appl Physiol 101: 887-892, 2006. First published May 18, 2006;doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00380.2006.-By the age of 80 yr, the skeletal muscles of men and women decrease in mass and maximum force by similar to 30%. Severe contraction-induced injury may contribute to these age-related declines. One to two months after a 225 lengthening contraction protocol (LCP), muscles of young/adult male mice recovered completely, whereas those of old male mice sustained deficits of similar to 15% in mass and similar to 25% in maximum force. Although gender-related differences in the early events of contraction-induced injury have been reported, the recovery phase of muscles in old female animals has not been investigated. The hypothesis tested was that 2 mo after a severe LCP to the plantar flexor muscle group, the magnitude of recovery of mass and force for old female mice is less than that for adult female mice. The LCP was administered to muscles of adult and old, female C57BL/6 mice. At 3 days, 1 mo, and 2 mo following the LCP, maximum isometric force was measured, and muscles were removed and weighed. Two months following the LCP, the muscles of adult female mice recovered mass and force. In contrast, for old female mice, even after 2 mo, muscle masses were decreased by 11% and maximum forces by 38%. We conclude that, as reported previously for old male mice, a severe contraction-induced injury to muscles of old female mice results in prolonged deficits in mass and force.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据