3.9 Article

Nature of functional estrogen receptors at the plasma membrane

期刊

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 1996-2009

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/me.2005-0525

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-100366] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although rapid signaling by estrogen at the plasma membrane is established, it is controversial as to the nature of the receptor protein. Estrogen may bind membrane proteins comparable to classical nuclear estrogen receptors ( ERs), but some studies identify nonclassical receptors, such as G protein-coupled receptor ( GPR) 30. We took several approaches to define membrane-localized estrogen-binding proteins. In endothelial cells ( ECs) from ER alpha/ER beta combined-deleted mice, estradiol ( E2) failed to specifically bind, and did not activate cAMP, ERK, or phosphatidyinositol 3-kinase or stimulate DNA synthesis. This is in contrast to wildtype ECs, indicating the lack of any functional estrogen-binding proteins in ER alpha/ER beta combined-deleted ECs. To directly determine the identity of membrane and nuclear-localized ER, we isolated subcellular receptor pools from MCF7 cells. Putative ER proteins were trypsin digested and subjected to tandem array mass spectrometry. The output analysis identified membrane and nuclear E2-binding proteins as classical human ER alpha. We also determined whether GPR30 plays any role in E2 rapid actions. MCF7 ( ER and GPR30 positive) and SKBR-3 ( ER negative, GPR30 positive) cells were incubated with E2. Only MCF7 responded with significantly increased signaling. In MCF7, the response to E2 was not different in cells transfected with small interfering RNA to green fluorescent protein or GPR30. In contrast, interfering RNA to ER alpha or ER inhibition prevented rapid signaling and resulting biology in MCF7. In breast cancer and ECs, nuclear and membrane ERs are the same proteins. Furthermore, classical ERs mediate rapid signals induced by E2 in these cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据