4.5 Article

From Comparative Effectiveness Research to Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: Integrating Emergency Care Goals, Methods, and Priorities

期刊

ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 309-316

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.03.021

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1KM1CA156715-01]
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Federal legislation placed comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research at the center of current and future national investments in health care research. The role of this research in emergency care has not been well described. This article proposes an agenda for researchers and health care providers to consider comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research methods and results to improve the care for patients who seek, use, and require emergency care. This objective will be accomplished by (1) exploring the definitions, frameworks, and nomenclature for comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research; (2) describing a conceptual model for comparative effectiveness research in emergency care; (3) identifying specific opportunities and examples of emergency care-related comparative effectiveness research; and (4) categorizing current and planned funding for comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research that can include emergency care delivery. [Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:309-316.]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据