4.5 Article

Prevention of the ischemia-induced decrease in mitochondrial Tom20 content by ischemic preconditioning

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.05.015

关键词

Tom20; mitochondria; ischemic preconditioning; Tim23; infarct size; pig

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preserved mitochondrial function (respiration, calcium handling) and integrity (cytochrome c release) is central for cell survival following ischemia/reperfusion. Mitochondrial function also requires import of proteins from the cytosol via the translocase of the outer and inner membrane (TOM and TIM complexes). Since mitochondrial function following ischemia/reperfusion is better preserved by ischemic preconditioning (IP), we now investigated whether expression of parts of the import machinery is affected by ischemia/reperfusion without or with IP in vivo. We analyzed the mitochondrial content of the presequence receptor Tom20, the pore forming unit Tom40 and Tim23. Goettinger minipigs were subjected to 90 min of low-flow ischemia without or with preconditioning by 10 min ischemia and 15 min reperfusion. Mitochondria were isolated from the ischemic or preconditioned anterior wall of the left ventricle and from the control posterior wall. Infarct size was significantly reduced by IP (20.1 +/- 1.6% of area at risk (non-preconditioned) vs. 6.5 +/- 2.5% of area at risk (IP)). Using Western blot analysis, the ratio of Tom20 (normalized to Ponceau S) between mitochondria isolated from the anterior ischemic and posterior control wall was reduced (0.72 +/- 0.11, a.u., n = 8), whereas the mitochondrial Tom20 content was preserved by IP (1.17 +/- 0.16 a.u., n = 7, P < 0.05). The mitochondrial Tom40, Tim23 and adenine nucleotide transporter (ANT) contents were not significantly different between non-preconditioned and preconditioned myocardium. The preservation of the mitochondrial Tom20 protein level may contribute to the improved mitochondrial function after IP. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据