4.5 Article

Optimal determination of rheological parameters for Herschel-Bulkley drilling fluids and impact on pressure drop, velocity profiles and penetration rates during drilling

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 53, 期 3-4, 页码 203-224

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2006.06.004

关键词

drilling fluids; rheology; Herschel-Bulkley; pressure drop; velocity profile; penetration rates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drilling fluids containing bentonite and bentonite-lignite as additives exhibit non-Newtonian rheological behavior which can be described well by the three parameter Herschel-Bulkley rheological model. It is shown that determination of these parameters using standard techniques can sometimes provide non-optimal and even unrealistic solutions which could be detrimental to the estimation of hydraulic parameters during drilling. An optimal procedure is proposed whereby the best value of the yield stress is estimated using the Golden Section search methodology while the fluid consistency and fluid behavior indices are determined with linear regression on the transformed rheometric data. The technique yields in many cases results which are as accurate as these obtained by non-linear regression but also gives positive yield stress in cases where numerical schemes give negative yield stress values. It is shown that the impact of the values of the model parameters can be significant for pressure drop estimation but less significant for velocity profile estimation for flow of these fluids in drill pipes and concentric annuli. It is demonstrated that very small differences; among the values of the model parameters determined by different techniques can lead to substantial differences in most operational hydraulic parameters in oil-well drilling, particularly pressure drop and apparent viscosity of the fluid at the drilling bit affecting penetration rates, signifying thus the importance of making the best simulation of the rheological behavior of drilling fluids. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据