4.6 Article

Quality and microbial population of Cornish game hen carcasses as affected by electron beam irradiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 71, 期 7, 页码 E327-E336

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00135.x

关键词

malonaldehyde; microbial counts; poultry meat; rancidity; sensory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated the chemical and microbiological quality of Cornish game hen carcasses irradiated up to 7 kGy with a 10 MeV linear accelerator (dual beam configuration). Eighty frozen and vaccum packaged (approximtely 0.45 kg) Cornish game hens (Gallus domesticus) were irradiated and stored in low-density polyethylene bags at 4 +/- 1 degrees C for 21 d; nonirradiated chickens served as controls. Fat oxidation (in terms of malonaldehyde content) increased with storage time and dose for all chicken parts analyzed (breast, thigh, and skin). As expected, the skin has the highest level of fat oxidation while the breast samples had the lowest. Oxidation level in all samples exposed to 2 kGy reached a maximum on day 14. Sensory evaluation showed that irradiation caused significant textural toughening, and increased the redness of raw chicken meat. In terms of overall quality and aroma, lipid oxidation was not a major problem since it was not detected by the panelists. Irradiation significantly reduced the total viable microbial counts (TVC) in the breast and thigh samples. Exposure to 3-kGy dose decreased the TVC by 0.3-log cycles on the surface of the skin. In less than 14 d, the nonirradiated chicken carcasses had counts greater than 6 log CFU/50 cm(2), while the 2 and 3 kGy irradiated samples reached these numbers only after 21 d of storage. Samples irradiated at 7 kGy had consistently the lowest counts (2.5 log CFU/50 cm(2)) throughout storage time. This study shows that irradiation up to 7 kGy and refrigerated storage (4 degrees C) inhibits microbial growth and extends shelf life of Cornish game hens without affecting consumers' acceptability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据